ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Quantitative Retinal Vascular Imaging Using Flood-Illuminated Adaptive Optics in Eyes with Lens Opacities.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Flood-illuminated adaptive optics (AO) imaging enables high-resolution quantification of retinal vascular morphology; however, its repeatability in older adults with lens opacities remains poorly characterized. In this prospective study, 40 subjects (66 eyes) underwent flood AO imaging using the rtx1 system (Imagine Eyes, Orsay, France) at three retinal locations across multiple sessions. Two independent masked graders measured lumen diameter (LD), total diameter (TD), wall cross-sectional area (WCSA), and wall-to-lumen ratio (WLR), with repeatability assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Inter-grader agreement was excellent for LD and TD across all regions (ICC range 0.974-0.994) and for WCSA at the superior and inferior regions (ICC range 0.902-0.952). Intrasession and intersession repeatability were similarly excellent for LD and TD across all locations. Repeatability remained excellent across age groups and cataract grades. Image region was the only variable significantly associated with image quality (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.