ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Correlation-Decoupled Interval Belief Rule Base for Interpretable Cross-Condition Bearing Fault Diagnosis.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cross-condition bearing fault diagnosis requires models that remain reliable under load-induced distribution shifts while providing transparent and traceable reasoning. Conventional belief rule bases (BRBs) may repeatedly use correlated vibration evidence during inference, and their Cartesian-product rule construction can rapidly increase rule-base complexity. This study proposes a correlation-decoupled interval belief rule base (CD-IBRB) for cross-condition bearing fault diagnosis. Seven diagnostically relevant time-domain features are selected using XGBoost and transformed into a less-correlated feature space through a Kendall-rank-correlation-guided matrix estimated exclusively from the source training data. Attribute-wise referential points and intervals are then constructed from the transformed training attributes, allowing the rule base to grow additively rather than combinatorially. Initial belief distributions are obtained from interval-level class distributions. The projection covariance matrix adaptation evolution strategy (P-CMA-ES) jointly optimizes the belief degrees, rule reliabilities, and rule weights, while evidential reasoning aggregates the activated interval rules to produce the final diagnostic result. In the primary cross-load bearing experiment, CD-IBRB achieved an accuracy of 0.9702 and a macro-averaged F1 score of 0.9703. It outperformed the strongest BRB variant and data-driven baseline by 7.70 and 6.10 percentage points in accuracy, respectively. Ablation experiments confirmed that removing parameter optimization or attribute decoupling reduced accuracy to 0.9053 and 0.9303, respectively. Additional cross-load and noise-injection experiments further demonstrated the stability of CD-IBRB under load shifts and input disturbances. Across five public multiclass datasets, CD-IBRB achieved a mean accuracy of 0.9004 and consistently outperformed the compared BRB variants. These results demonstrate that CD-IBRB provides a compact, uncertainty-aware, and traceable framework for cross-condition bearing fault diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.