Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42649714›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2026

XGBoost Classification of Epileptic EEG Using Nonlinear Dynamical Features and SHAP.

Xiaojie Lu, Hui Lou, Xiaoyang Jin, Bianmei Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xiaojie LuSchool of Medical Information, Wannan Medical University, Wuhu 241002, China.
Hui LouSchool of Medical Information, Wannan Medical University, Wuhu 241002, China.
Xiaoyang JinSchool of Medical Information, Wannan Medical University, Wuhu 241002, China.
Bianmei ZhangSchool of Medical Information, Wannan Medical University, Wuhu 241002, China.

Funding

Anhui Provincial Department of Education 2023AH051757Anhui Provincial Department of Education 2025cjkc057Anhui Provincial Department of Education 2025zyxwjxalk363
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To evaluate whether nonlinear descriptors of electroencephalogram (EEG) signals support interpretable XGBoost classification and to determine how analysis window duration affects performance. A secondary analysis of the public Bonn EEG dataset was performed. Nine nonlinear features were extracted from non-overlapping 1, 5, 10, and 20 s windows after an original-recording-level train/validation/test split, and a multiclass XGBoost model was interpreted with class-specific SHAP values. The model achieved 93.3% overall accuracy; the class-specific AUC values were 0.978 for Z/O, 0.978 for N/F, and 0.984 for S. Across the four fixed-split duration conditions, the 1 s condition had the lowest descriptive performance, whereas the 5, 10, and 20 s conditions were broadly comparable; no uniquely optimal duration was established. The nonlinear-feature/XGBoost framework provides interpretable benchmark segment classification evidence. Because EEG is modeled as a stochastic process and the dataset is small and heterogeneous, the SHAP attributions do not establish physiological causality or clinical diagnostic validity.

Indexed as

EEGnonlinear dynamicSHAPXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID42649714
PMCPMC13512526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.