ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2026
XGBoost Classification of Epileptic EEG Using Nonlinear Dynamical Features and SHAP.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To evaluate whether nonlinear descriptors of electroencephalogram (EEG) signals support interpretable XGBoost classification and to determine how analysis window duration affects performance. A secondary analysis of the public Bonn EEG dataset was performed. Nine nonlinear features were extracted from non-overlapping 1, 5, 10, and 20 s windows after an original-recording-level train/validation/test split, and a multiclass XGBoost model was interpreted with class-specific SHAP values. The model achieved 93.3% overall accuracy; the class-specific AUC values were 0.978 for Z/O, 0.978 for N/F, and 0.984 for S. Across the four fixed-split duration conditions, the 1 s condition had the lowest descriptive performance, whereas the 5, 10, and 20 s conditions were broadly comparable; no uniquely optimal duration was established. The nonlinear-feature/XGBoost framework provides interpretable benchmark segment classification evidence. Because EEG is modeled as a stochastic process and the dataset is small and heterogeneous, the SHAP attributions do not establish physiological causality or clinical diagnostic validity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.