ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Physics-Informed Neural Network Scheme for Shortcuts to Adiabaticity in Three-Level Non-Hermitian Quantum Systems.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We propose a physics-informed neural network (PINN) scheme for designing shortcuts to adiabaticity in a three-level non-Hermitian quantum system. The PINN is used to solve an inverse control problem in which the state amplitudes and the auxiliary driving field are learned simultaneously from the Schrödinger residual, the initial and target population constraints and a probability conservation constraint on the control pulse. The learned compensation field counteracts the loss of the intermediate state and enables high-fidelity population inversion in an open-system setting. Importantly, the imposed probability conservation is treated as an auxiliary constraint along the learned trajectory rather than as an intrinsic property of the non-Hermitian Hamiltonian. Under this constrained evolution, the Hamiltonian expectation value evaluated on the obtained state remains real within numerical accuracy. Numerical simulations and independent propagation with the fitted control field verify the population inversion and exhibit strong generalization capability over a range of coupling strengths and dissipation rates, as verified by retraining the network independently for each parameter set. The results demonstrate that PINNs provide a flexible inverse design tool for non-Hermitian shortcut to adiabaticity protocols when the governing dynamics and physical constraints are explicitly incorporated into the loss function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.