ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Quantum Annealing Approach for Solving Optimal Feature Selection and Next Release Problems.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Search-based software engineering (SBSE) tackles critical optimization problems in software engineering, including the next release problem (NRP) and feature selection problem (FSP). Traditional heuristic approaches and integer linear programming (ILP) methods work well for small- to medium-scale problems but face growing computational cost as instances scale up. We investigate quantum annealing (QA) as an optimization subroutine for multi-objective SBSE problems. We propose two QA-based algorithms tailored to different problem scales. For small-scale problems, we reformulate multi-objective optimization (MOO) as single-objective optimization (SOO) using penalty-based mappings for quantum processing. For large-scale problems that exceed current hardware capacity, we employ a decomposition strategy guided by maximum energy impact (MEI) that partitions the problem into smaller sub-QUBOs, integrating QA with a steepest-descent method for local search. Applied to NRP and FSP, our approaches are benchmarked against the heuristic NSGA-II, IBEA, and MOEA/D, as well as the ILP-based ϵ-constraint method. The experimental results reveal that while our methods produce fewer non-dominated solutions than ϵ-constraint, they achieve substantial reductions in execution time. Compared to the evolutionary baselines, our methods achieve competitive solution quality with lower runtime on the instances that they can encode. The penalty-based QUBO formulation fails to reach feasible regions on constraint-dense FSP instances, limiting the current applicability of the approach. QA is a promising but still hardware-limited component for multi-objective SBSE workflows, rather than a wholesale replacement for classical solvers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.