ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Finite-Resolution Information from Collision Statistics.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Collision statistics provide a finite-resolution view of information by measuring how often independent samples fall on the same state and form the basis of integer-order Rényi entropies. Here, we use low-order Rényi entropies to characterize finite-resolution approximations to Shannon entropy and mutual information. Specifically, we determine what population information is captured by finite collision moments, we quantify how the resulting targets differ from their Shannon counterparts, and we analyze how accurately they can be estimated from finite samples. We use the interpolation remainder to identify structural approximation error induced by extrapolating from integer-order Rényi entropies to the Shannon point. We separate this deterministic error from finite-sample estimation error: increasing sample size improves estimation of a finite-resolution target but does not eliminate its deterministic difference from Shannon entropy or mutual information. Finally, we show that finite collision moments do not generally identify Shannon entropy, and that increasing collision order shifts sensitivity toward high-probability events. Our numerical experiments illustrate the approximation-estimation trade-off and evaluate collision-based approximations alongside plug-in and Miller-Madow estimators. Together, these results provide a principled way to use low-order coincidence structure as finite-resolution information, while making explicit what finite collision moments can and cannot reveal about Shannon entropy and mutual information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.