Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42649677›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Finite-Resolution Information from Collision Statistics.

Alexander J Gates

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Alexander J GatesSchool of Data Science, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0099-7480

Funding

National Security Data & Policy Institute 2024-24070100001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Collision statistics provide a finite-resolution view of information by measuring how often independent samples fall on the same state and form the basis of integer-order Rényi entropies. Here, we use low-order Rényi entropies to characterize finite-resolution approximations to Shannon entropy and mutual information. Specifically, we determine what population information is captured by finite collision moments, we quantify how the resulting targets differ from their Shannon counterparts, and we analyze how accurately they can be estimated from finite samples. We use the interpolation remainder to identify structural approximation error induced by extrapolating from integer-order Rényi entropies to the Shannon point. We separate this deterministic error from finite-sample estimation error: increasing sample size improves estimation of a finite-resolution target but does not eliminate its deterministic difference from Shannon entropy or mutual information. Finally, we show that finite collision moments do not generally identify Shannon entropy, and that increasing collision order shifts sensitivity toward high-probability events. Our numerical experiments illustrate the approximation-estimation trade-off and evaluate collision-based approximations alongside plug-in and Miller-Madow estimators. Together, these results provide a principled way to use low-order coincidence structure as finite-resolution information, while making explicit what finite collision moments can and cannot reveal about Shannon entropy and mutual information.

Indexed as

collision probabilityfinite-sample estimationmutual informationpower sumsRényi entropyShannon entropy

Identifiers

PMID42649677
PMCPMC13511918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.