ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Hybrid Quantile-Expectile Error Layers for Technical-Efficiency Recovery in Stochastic Frontier Analysis.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper develops and evaluates HQER-SFA, a likelihood-based stochastic frontier specification that embeds a hybrid quantile-expectile error layer into the bilateral noise component while preserving the standard one-sided inefficiency structure. The model nests Quantile-SFA when γ=0 and extends it by normalizing the hybrid loss into a proper bilateral error density, so that likelihood inference, residual decomposition, and technical-efficiency recovery remain in a unified stochastic-frontier framework. We compare HQER-SFA with Traditional-SFA and Quantile-SFA using three processed production modules, Monte Carlo parameter-inversion experiments, an expanded R=300 robustness design, γ sensitivity and ablation checks, convergence diagnostics, and a source-assisted small-sample extension. The results demonstrate clear gains for technical-efficiency recovery: in the R=300 design, HQER-SFA attains win rates of 0.5646 for technical-efficiency RMSE and 0.5578 for technical-efficiency rank correlation, and the agricultural module shows the strongest real-data improvement under the flexible bilateral error layer. The source-assisted analysis further shows that same-domain initialization improves small-sample validation RMSE by about 2.43%, while excessive source-centered penalties should be controlled. Overall, HQER-SFA provides an interpretable and computationally feasible extension for technical-efficiency recovery, especially when bilateral noise is asymmetric, tail-sensitive, or heterogeneous across production modules.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.