ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Computational Bayesian Framework for Entropy-Based Inference in the Inverse Gaussian Distribution Under Progressive Type-II Censoring.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Estimating entropy measures under progressive censoring poses a significant challenge in reliability and lifetime analysis. Despite the widespread use of the inverse Gaussian distribution in modeling skewed lifetime data, a comprehensive inferential framework for its Shannon and Rényi entropies under progressive Type-II censoring remains absent. This paper develops a unified Bayesian framework integrating maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference under squared error, general entropy, and LINEX loss functions, employing Lindley's approximation, importance sampling, and Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. Two parameter configurations were examined to assess robustness under varying likelihood surface complexity, along with prior sensitivity analysis. Results demonstrate that Markov chain Monte Carlo and importance sampling are the only consistently reliable methods across all scenarios, whereas maximum likelihood suffered severe bias and collapse of Wald interval coverage under challenging settings, and Lindley's approximation exhibited numerical instability at small samples. Shannon entropy proved substantially more sensitive to parameter variation than Rényi entropy, with the LINEX and general entropy loss functions showing superior performance. The study offers clear practical guidance, validated on real lifetime data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.