ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Quantitative Assessment and Verification of Quantum Neural Network Security Based on Violations of the Bell Inequality.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
In response to the current research landscape, which lacks unified quantitative standards and a reproducible verification framework for assessing the security of quantum neural networks (QNNs), this paper proposes a quantitative evaluation system and verification scheme for QNN security based on the violation characteristics of CHSH-type Bell inequalities. This method treats quantum entanglement as the core element of intrinsic security and establishes a controlled-variable controlled experiment involving purely classical models, non-entangled QNNs, weakly entangled QNNs, and strongly entangled QNNs. Numerical simulations were conducted using the Iris dataset; the presence of quantum entanglement was determined using the CHSH statistic, and a quantitative metric system centered on the normalized CHSH observation metric Q was constructed. Based on the theoretical limits of Bell's inequalities, a normalization derivation was performed to establish the theoretical constraint interval of 0≤Q≤1; the threshold values of 0.3 and 0.7 obtained from the simulations are applicable only to the experimental scenarios described in this paper and serve solely as a reference for grouping data within the experiment; they do not possess universal validity for determination. Simulation results show that the CHSH values for the weakly and strongly entangled QNN experimental groups can reach 2.8284, significantly exceeding the theoretical limits of classical locality. These values correspond to an observation metric of Q=0.9838 and a privacy protection strength of P=0.8854, with the security level rated as high. The CHSH values of the non-entangled QNN and the purely classical model do not exceed the classical threshold of 2; they exhibit no quantum nonlocality or quantum advantage, and their security level is rated as low. This paper advances the security evaluation of QNNs from qualitative, empirical judgments to verifiable quantitative classification, providing a theoretical basis and evaluation framework for the practical application of quantum neural networks in highly security-sensitive scenarios such as privacy-preserving computing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.