ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Hardware-Aware Quantum Kernel Design Based on Graph Neural Networks.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Quantum kernel methods for marketing analytics with convergence theory and separation bounds.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Quantum kernels hold significant promise for achieving computational advantages in quantum machine learning (QML), yet their effectiveness critically depends on the design of expressive and hardware-compatible feature maps, a challenge that is particularly pronounced in Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices with limited qubits, gate errors, and restricted connectivity. In this work, we propose a hardware-aware methodology for automated quantum kernel design that integrates quantum device characteristics with learning-based evaluation. Specifically, candidate quantum circuits explored within the hardware-aware circuit space are represented as directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) encoding hardware-specific information such as gate operations, qubit interactions, and noise properties, while a dual graph neural network (GNN) predictor is employed to estimate key surrogate metrics, including probability of successful trials (PST) and kernel-target alignment (KTA), enabling efficient and accurate assessment of circuit fidelity and kernel performance to facilitate the identification of task-specific quantum kernels. Furthermore, feature selection is incorporated to reduce input dimensionality and ensure compatibility with near-term devices. Extensive experiments on multiple benchmark datasets, including Credit Card (CC), MNIST-5, and FMNIST-4, demonstrate that our method consistently outperforms existing baselines in classification accuracy, effectively balancing hardware constraints and model expressivity under realistic noise conditions. These results highlight the potential of combining hardware-aware design with deep learning techniques to advance practical quantum kernel methods under hardware-calibrated noisy simulation settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.