Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42649642›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Information-Theoretic Causal Feature Selection via Markov Blanket Discovery for Stock Return Direction Prediction: Evidence from China.

Jiamei Zhou, Hongxu Wu, Shaoze Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jiamei ZhouCollege of Computer and Cyber Security, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350117, China.ORCID 0009-0008-4051-3026
Hongxu WuSchool of Finance and Accounting, Fujian Business University, Fuzhou 350012, China.
Shaoze LiSchool of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6370-3438

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stock markets are complex adaptive systems whose feature dependencies evolve over time, and identifying which signals genuinely drive returns is fundamentally a problem of information. Traditional feature selection methods and linear models rely on statistical correlations and overlook causality, which weakens their predictive performance in non-linear, evolving markets. This paper develops an information-theoretic approach to causal feature selection based on Markov Blanket discovery. We apply the Iterative Parent-Child-based search of Markov Blanket (IPCMB), whose conditional-independence tests are conditional mutual information measures, to recover the Markov Blanket of next-month returns-the minimal feature set that carries all Shannon information about the target. We then pair it with a Classification and Regression Tree (CART), whose impurity-based splitting admits an information-gain interpretation, to predict the direction of Chinese A-share returns non-linearly. Using data on 2760 stocks, IPCMB selects 13 causal features from 72 candidates, and CART forecasts whether the next month's return is positive. The empirical results show an accuracy of 58.0%, 7.7 percentage points above the all-features CART benchmark, and a 13-month cumulative return 35.88% higher than that of the CSI 300 index. The findings indicate that selecting features according to their causal information content and combining them with interpretable tree-based prediction can support more reliable investment decisions in emerging markets.

Indexed as

causal feature selectionChinese stock marketconditional mutual informationIPCMB-CARTMarkov Blanketstock direction prediction

Identifiers

PMID42649642
PMCPMC13512472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.