Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42649513›Full record

ReviewJournal of cardiovascular imaging2026

Reinventing the echocardiography workflow: from manual quantification to artificial intelligence-driven comprehensive interpretation.

Ran Heo, Seung-Ah Lee, Hyuk-Jae Chang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ran HeoDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University Medical Center, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Seung-Ah LeeCONNECT-AI Research Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hyuk-Jae ChangCONNECT-AI Research Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. hjchang@yuhs.ac.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Echocardiography remains the cornerstone of cardiovascular imaging. However, traditional workflows including manual acquisition, sequential measurement, and expert interpretation face challenges from increased clinical demand, workforce shortage, and the physical burden of repetitive scanning. Artificial intelligence (AI) has begun to address these issues, transitioning from proof-of-concept to prospective clinical evaluations. Recent evidence suggests that AI integration reduces examination time and automates measurements, enabling more comprehensive data collection while mitigating sonographer fatigue and improving image quality. The sonographer's role is accordingly evolving from conventional measurement to active verification. AI applications in echocardiography now extend beyond ejection fraction to integrated assessments of myocardial texture and Doppler hemodynamics. New model architectures incorporate both structural and functional evaluations, reflecting clinical reasoning of the expert. These methods are being applied to valvular heart disease, cardiomyopathy, and pericardial disorders. Clinical implementation of AI in echocardiography requires more than high accuracy. Current evidence is limited by reliance on single-center studies, inconsistent performance across platforms, and the potential for automation bias in high-volume settings. This review evaluates current evidence, identifies existing gaps, and outlines the requirements for responsible clinical implementation of AI.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceEchocardiographyGlobal Longitudinal StrainPoint-of-care testingWorkflow

Identifiers

PMID42649513
PMCPMC13508549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.