Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42649443›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2026

Fertility Preservation Pathways in Young Women With Breast Cancer: A Single-Center Analysis in a Publicly Funded System.

Elisheva Strauss, Jordana Hyman, Shani Paluch-Shimon, Shani Breuer, Ido Ben-Ami, Naama Srebnik, Hen Y Sela, Avi Tsafrir

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Elisheva StraussSackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-0699-9060
Jordana HymanIVF Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Hebrew University Faculty of Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-5492-7043
Shani Paluch-ShimonBreast Oncology Unit, Hadassah University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6677-2199
Shani BreuerBreast Oncology Unit, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-4381-292X
Ido Ben-AmiIVF Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Hebrew University Faculty of Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1506-6670
Naama SrebnikIVF Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Hebrew University Faculty of Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0488-9313
Hen Y SelaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Hebrew University Faculty of Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9859-469X
Avi TsafrirIVF Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel. avitz@hadassah.org.il.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2676-3877

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFertility concerns are central to the care of young women with breast cancer. Cancer treatments and chemotherapeutic regimens may adversely affect reproductive potential. Despite extensive attention to fertility preservation (FP), reported uptake remains low. It remains unclear how patients progress through the fertility preservation process within publicly funded health care systems that reduce financial and access barriers.

methodsKey time points in the patient care sequence were assessed, beginning with the initial oncology or surgical consultation, at which fertility discussion (FD), defined as counseling by an oncologist or breast surgeon, could occur, followed by fertility consultation (FC), defined as consultation with a fertility specialist, and uptake of FP, including oocyte, embryo, or ovarian tissue cryopreservation, but not hormonal ovarian protection.

resultsAmong 248 women, 77.8% had FD, 40.7% underwent FC, and 27.4% proceeded to FP. The largest reduction occurred between the FD and the FC, whereas progression from consultation to preservation remained high. Although women aged 40 years or older and those with two or more children were less likely to proceed to FC and FP, they still represented a measurable proportion of those undergoing preservation.

conclusionFertility discussions were documented for most patients, and progression from FC to FP was high. The overall proportion of women undergoing FP was higher than previously reported in earlier studies. These findings suggest that previously reported low utilization rates may not fully capture patients' interest in FP and may, in part, be attributable to differences in patterns of care delivery.

Indexed as

Breast cancerEmbryo cryopreservationFertility preservationHealthcare accessOncofertilityOocyte cryopreservation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.