ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2026
GDLS-D: two-stage medical surface reconstruction via geometric diffusion least squares and iterative deformation optimization.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Surface representations of anatomical structures are crucial for medical applications including preoperative planning and biomechanical simulations, yet current methods face challenges from limited datasets and staircase artifacts. This study proposes a training-free two-stage optimization framework for accurate 3D reconstruction. First, a method named geometric diffusion least squares is proposed to generate the template which is homeomorphic to the anatomical structure. Second, the template mesh is iteratively refined through continuous mesh deformation to obtain the final optimal result. Evaluations on liver, ilium, and vertebrae achieved bi-directional chamfer distances (L1 norm) of 3.675 mm, 2.654 mm, and 2.508 mm, respectively. Compared to state-of-the-art deep learning methods (Voxel2Mesh and MeshDeformNet), our approach improves average accuracy by 33.11% across three metrics, effectively suppressed staircase artifacts, and demonstrated promising generalization across anatomical structures. While traditional methods yield better accuracy metrics due to overfitting to mask boundaries, our method produces watertight meshes with significantly lower aspect ratios and no staircase artifacts. The proposed framework overcomes current limitations, offering a precise, generalizable solution for surface reconstruction of volumetric medical images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42649431What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.