ArticleBritish journal of cancer2026
Risk prediction model for brain metastasis risk among patients diagnosed with primary gastrointestinal cancers.
Article in British journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe risk of radiotherapy-treated brain metastasis (BrM) in gastrointestinal (GI) cancers is poorly defined. We aimed to determine its incidence and develop a clinically interpretable prediction model.
methodsPatients with GI cancers diagnosed between 2005-2020 were identified from our registry. Receipt of brain radiotherapy was used to define radiotherapy-treated BrM. Logistic regression was performed on a training cohort to identify BrM predictors, which were then used to construct a risk score, and validate performance in a held-out cohort. Model performance was assessed with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, calibration, Brier score, and Multiple imputation by chained equations (MICE) sensitivity analysis.
resultsAmong 14,863 eligible patients, the 15-year cumulative incidence of clinically treated BrM was 1.89%. Median OS following BrM was 3.7 months. Logistic regression was performed in 11,022 patients with complete data. In the complete-case training cohort (n = 7348), significant predictors included primary site, clinical stage, chemotherapy, and recurrence at presentation. The AUC was 0.80, with good calibration and Brier score 0.012. Medium- and high-risk groups had higher BrM risk in validation (HR 4.57 and 11.35, respectively).
conclusionsWe developed an internally validated prediction model for BrM in GI cancers. External validation is required.
Identifiers
42649380What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.