ArticleCardiovascular and interventional radiology2026
Clinical Outcomes in Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia Patients Undergoing Femoropopliteal Endovascular Treatment Using IN.PACT versus Ranger: Results of the PEPPERMINT Study.
Article in Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo compare the clinical outcomes of high-dose PCB (HD-PCB) and low-dose PCB (LD-PCB) in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). MATERIALS AND
methodsThis study is a multicenter retrospective observational study conducted at 21 institutions in Japan. Patients with CLTI who underwent femoropopliteal endovascular treatment using IN.PACT Admiral DCB (HD-PCB, 3.5 μg/mm
resultsA total of 323 patients were included (IN.PACT, n = 211; Ranger, n = 112). Median follow-up was 11.6 months. No significant difference in restenosis was observed between groups (HR 1.05; 95% CI 0.74-1.50; P = 0.78). After Bonferroni correction, slow flow occurred significantly more frequently in the IN.PACT group than in the Ranger group (6.8% vs. 1.0%; OR 11.9; 99.5% CI 1.27-59.3; P = 0.002). No significant intergroup differences were observed in target lesion revascularization, major adverse limb events, wound healing, major amputation, or mortality.
conclusionsTreatment outcomes for femoropopliteal lesions in patients with CLTI were comparable between the IN.PACT Admiral and Ranger DCBs. However, slow-flow phenomenon was observed more frequently in the IN.PACT group, warranting further investigation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3, Cohort Study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42649342What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.