ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
An Imaging Informatics Workflow for Angiography-Derived Coronary Physiology Profiling and Virtual PCI Simulation.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coronary angiography is routinely acquired during invasive assessment of coronary artery disease, but its interpretation remains fragmented across visual stenosis assessment, quantitative anatomy, physiology estimation, and procedural planning. Existing angiography-derived physiology tools typically provide vessel-level scalar outputs and are not tightly integrated with automated image analysis, longitudinal functional profiling, and interactive simulation within a unified imaging informatics workflow. We developed AngioAI-QFR, an end-to-end imaging informatics pipeline for coronary angiography that integrates automated stenosis localisation, lumen segmentation, centreline-based geometric reconstruction, per-millimetre relative flow capacity profiling, angiography-derived physiology estimation, graph-image co-registration, and virtual PCI simulation. The system was retrospectively evaluated in 100 coronary vessels from 92 patients with invasive fractional flow reserve as the reference standard. Evaluation included computer-vision performance, agreement with invasive FFR, diagnostic performance for FFR ≤ 0.80, automation rate, processing time, and exploratory analysis of focal versus diffuse functional patterns. The pipeline achieved high stenosis detection performance and feasible lumen segmentation, with detection precision of 0.966, mean average precision at an intersection over union (IoU) threshold of 0.50 (mAP@50) of 0.973, segmentation IoU of 0.757, and Dice coefficient of 0.861. AngioAI-QFR demonstrated strong correlation and good overall agreement with invasive FFR, with Pearson r = 0.917, mean absolute error of 0.035, root mean squared error of 0.044, mean bias of - 0.004, and 95% limits of agreement from - 0.091 to 0.083. Diagnostic discrimination for invasive FFR ≤ 0.80 was high, with an AUROC of 0.943, sensitivity of 0.881, and specificity of 0.897. The workflow completed fully automatically in 93% of vessels, with a median time to result of 41 s. Longitudinal RFC profiling separated focal from diffuse impairment patterns and enabled exploratory virtual PCI simulations with immediate recomputation of post-simulation physiology estimates. AngioAI-QFR demonstrates the feasibility of a unified imaging informatics workflow that transforms routine coronary angiography into co-registered anatomical, functional, and simulation-ready representations. The system integrates automated image interpretation, longitudinal physiology visualisation, and virtual intervention simulation within a sub-minute workflow. Prospective multicentre validation, external dataset testing, and post-PCI physiological validation are required before clinical deployment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.