SynthesisCerebellum (London, England)2026
Post-Infectious Cerebellitis: A Systematic Review of Aetiology, Clinical Presentation, Treatment, and Outcomes.
Synthesis in Cerebellum (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Post-infectious cerebellitis is an immune-mediated cerebellar inflammatory syndrome that follows a preceding infection (or, rarely, vaccination) after a latent interval. It spans a spectrum from benign post-infectious/acute cerebellar ataxia (ACA) through more severe acute cerebellitis (AC) with leptomeningeal enhancement and mass effect, to rare, life-threatening acute fulminant cerebellitis (AFC) with hydrocephalus risk. Evidence is largely limited to individual case reports and small case series, and no prior review has systematically pooled patient-level data across etiologies. A PRISMA-guided systematic review screened 899 records identified through electronic database searches, citation tracking, and supplementary bibliography searches. After duplicate removal and eligibility assessment, 47 studies (case reports, case series, and cohort studies) were included in the qualitative synthesis. Patient-level data from 73 individuals were extracted for quantitative pooling. Pooled patients had a mean age of 24.5 years (range 7 months-74 years; 40 pediatric, 28 adult); of 70 patients with sex reported, 51 (72.9%) were male. Based on neuroimaging findings and the presence of life-threatening features, 34 patients (46.6%) were classified as acute cerebellar ataxia (ACA), 26 (35.6%) as acute cerebellitis (AC), and 13 (17.8%) as acute fulminant cerebellitis (AFC), with complete recovery in 58.8%, 69.2%, and 69.2% of each subtype, respectively, and the cohort's only death occurring in the AFC subgroup. SARS-CoV-2 (n = 24, 32.9%) was the most frequently identified trigger, followed by patients with no pathogen identified (n = 18, 24.7%), varicella-zoster virus (n = 8, 11.0%), Epstein-Barr virus (n = 5, 6.8%), and influenza (n = 5, 6.8%). Corticosteroids were the most common treatment (54/73, 74.0%), followed by antivirals (35/73, 47.9%) and IVIG (19/73, 26.0%); plasma exchange was given for refractory cases. Complete recovery occurred in 47/73 patients (64.4%), partial recovery/residual deficit in 15/73 (20.5%), outcome was not stated for 10/73 (13.7%), and one death (1.4%) was recorded (COVID-19-associated necrotizing encephalopathy) - the only fatality, occurring in an adult. Post-infectious cerebellitis is a heterogeneous, largely immune-mediated syndrome with a generally favorable prognosis after corticosteroid-based immunotherapy, though outcomes and evidence quality vary by etiology and severity subgroup.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42649322What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.