Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42649316›Full record

ArticleThe EMBO journal2026

Response of the replisome to araA and araC suggests a mechanism for arabinosyl nucleoside tolerance.

Harry Orrin, Joseph T P Yeeles

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The EMBO journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Harry OrrinMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK. horrin@ed.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2989-5162
Joseph T P YeelesMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK. jyeeles@mrclmb.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2255-2119

Funding

Cancer Research UK (CRUK) CTRQQR-2021\100012UKRI | MRC | Medical Research Council Laboratory of Molecular Biology (LMB) MC_UP_1201/12
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Arabinosyl (ara) nucleoside analogues such as vidarabine (araA) and cytarabine (araC) are antimetabolites known to inhibit DNA polymerases in isolation. However, their effects on DNA synthesis catalysed by the multi-protein replisome remain unknown. Here, we uncover a central role for the lagging-strand DNA polymerase, Pol δ, in tolerating these drugs. Upon DNA synthesis inhibition by ara nucleotides, Pol δ replaces the canonical leading-strand DNA polymerase, Pol ε, to synthesise and proofread nascent leading strands in vitro and in vivo, with these Pol δ activities limiting helicase-polymerase uncoupling and intra-S checkpoint activation. Removal of ara analogues from nascent strands by DNA polymerase proofreading is likely the primary resistance mechanism against these drugs since a template-embedded analogue can be bypassed by the replisome. This study defines the initial response of the eukaryotic replisome to araA and araC and may have implications for how resistance arises against them, and other nucleoside analogue chemotherapeutics, in the clinic.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.