ArticleNature medicine2026
Recombinant shingles vaccination and the risk of cardiovascular events.
Article in Nature medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Herpes Zoster Vaccination as Cardiovascular Prevention in Adults with Heart Disease.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The recombinant herpes zoster (shingles) vaccine may reduce risks of cardiovascular disease. However, existing studies have compared vaccine recipients with non-recipients and, thus, are susceptible to confounding. To mitigate these biases, we conducted a natural experiment created by the rapid transition from the live attenuated to the recombinant shingles vaccine in the United States. We compared incidences of a composite cardiovascular endpoint (ischemic heart disease, heart failure or ischemic stroke) among adults aged ≥60 years vaccinated immediately before versus immediately after this transition. The recombinant vaccine was associated with a 9% decrease in cardiovascular burden over 7 years (restricted mean time lost (RMTL) ratio = 0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.88-0.95). The association attenuated over time and was significant for ischemic heart disease (10% decrease in burden; RMTL ratio = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.87-0.94) and heart failure (12% decrease in burden; RMTL ratio = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.83-0.93) in both sexes and ischemic stroke in males (12% decrease; RMTL ratio = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.78-0.98). An association was also seen for atrial fibrillation (7% decrease in burden; RMTL = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.88-0.98) but not other cardiac, peripheral and cerebrovascular outcomes. Results were consistent in secondary analyses. These results justify clinical trials and mechanistic studies to investigate potential cardioprotective effects of shingles vaccines.
Identifiers
42649256What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.