Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42649255›Full record

ArticleNature human behaviour2026

Public perceptions of polygenic testing and embryo selection for non-medical traits.

Edmond Awad, Clara Colombatto, Joanna Demaree-Cotton, Brian D Earp, Jim A C Everett, Peng Liu, G Owen Schaefer, Ilina Singh, Dominic Wilkinson, Julian Savulescu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature human behaviour, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trusting the body and self-harm.Nature human behaviour · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Edmond AwadUehiro Oxford Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. e.awad@exeter.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7272-7186
Clara ColombattoSchool of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3293-8741
Joanna Demaree-CottonUehiro Oxford Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Brian D EarpUehiro Oxford Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9691-2888
Jim A C EverettSchool of Psychology, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.
Peng LiuCentre for Biomedical Ethics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4929-0531
G Owen SchaeferCentre for Biomedical Ethics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Ilina SinghDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Dominic WilkinsonUehiro Oxford Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. dominic.wilkinson@uehiro.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3958-8633
Julian SavulescuUehiro Oxford Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. jsavules@nus.edu.sg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1691-6403

Funding

DH | National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) NIHR203316
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Some advances in reproductive technologies raise substantial ethical and psychological challenges, for example, the use of preimplantation genetic testing to select embryos based on non-medical traits. While studies have explored public willingness to use preimplantation genetic testing for medical or non-medical attributes, stated willingness may not reflect implantation decisions when such information is available. This large cross-national study examined public views on polygenic embryo testing. In a US sample (N = 1,467), participants were more willing to test for medical conditions (for example, heart disease) than non-medical traits (for example, antisocial behaviour or low intelligence), although over half supported testing for non-medical traits. In a forced-choice implantation task, participants used medical and non-medical information to a similar extent when making decisions. Similar patterns were observed in Chinese participants (N = 623). These findings suggest variability in choices across specific traits and conditions, rather than a uniform distinction between medical conditions and non-medical traits. The Stage 1 protocol for this Registered Report was accepted in principle on 7 October 2025. The protocol, as accepted by the journal, can be found at https://osf.io/vb9c2 .

Identifiers

PMID42649255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.