Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42649240›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2026

Effects of prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation on open-label placebo responses.

Britt Lou Brehm, Anna-Maria Macha, Phillip Alexander Denk, Anne Weigand, Michael Schaefer

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Britt Lou BrehmInstitute of Neuroscience and Biopsychology for Clinical Application, MSB Medical School Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Anna-Maria MachaInstitute of Neuroscience and Biopsychology for Clinical Application, MSB Medical School Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Phillip Alexander DenkInstitute of Neuroscience and Biopsychology for Clinical Application, MSB Medical School Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-2387-3141
Anne Weigand *Institute of Neuroscience and Biopsychology for Clinical Application, MSB Medical School Berlin, Berlin, Germany. anne.weigand@medicalschool-berlin.de.
Michael Schaefer *Institute of Neuroscience and Biopsychology for Clinical Application, MSB Medical School Berlin, Berlin, Germany. michael.schaefer@medicalschool-berlin.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7257-9267

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) 543087150, SCHA 105/18-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent research has shown that placebos can have beneficial effects even when given without deception. Such effects have been reported for outcomes including pain, anxiety or emotional distress. However, the mechanisms behind these open-label placebo (OLP) effects still remain unclear. For conventionally concealed placebos, a central role of expectation has been discussed, which has been linked to an engagement of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Evidence from non-invasive brain stimulation studies suggests that inhibition of this brain region abolishes the placebo effect, whereas its activation enhances it. Here, we applied prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to test the role of expectation for placebos without deception. A total of 112 participants were assigned either to an OLP group or to a control group prior to viewing emotionally distressing images. All participants completed both active and sham tDCS in two separate sessions. Our results replicated the OLP effect by showing reduced emotional distress for the placebo group during sham stimulation. TDCS alleviated emotional distress in the control group but did not enhance the placebo response in the OLP condition. The results suggest that expectation of treatment effects may play a more limited role in OLP responses than in conventionally concealed placebos. OLPs may therefore represent a multimodal behavioral intervention whose neural underpinnings differ, at least in part, from those underlying placebos with deception.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.