ArticleJournal of human hypertension2026
Associated factors of elastic and stiffening components of pulse pressure based on 45 517 database of 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.
Article in Journal of human hypertension, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pulse pressure (PP), which has been proposed to be a marker of hypertension-mediated organ damage (HMOD) in elderly, can be divided into two components: elastic PP (elPP) and stiffening PP (stPP). Thus, the aim of our study was to explore the associated factors of 24 h elPP and stPP. ABPM data of 45 517 subjects (age: 56.4 ± 14.9 years, male: 20 897 (45.9%)) were collected from the Hungarian ABPM Registry between September 2020 and August 2024. Subjects' clinical data were analyzed together with ABPM curves. elPP and stPP were calculated according to published formulas. The elPP was higher in men than in women (46.4 ± 8.2 vs 45.8 ± 9.2 mmHg, p < 0.05), whereas stPP was higher in women than in men (8.9 ± 5.8 vs 8.3 ± 5.5 mmHg, p < 0.05). elPP showed a U-shaped curve with age, which had a higher value below 40 years (47.3 ± 8 mmHg), then it decreased between 40-49 and 50-59 years (43.7 ± 7.3 and 43.9 ± 8 mmHg, respectively) and it increased again reaching 49.4 ± 9.7 mmHg above the age >70 years, while stPP progressively increased with ageing. Multiple correlates of elPP and stPP were identified based on age groups, sex, heart rate and antihypertensive medication. In conclusions, the evaluation of the associated factors of elPP and stPP and of elPP decrease in middle-aged subjects can help to better understand the pathomechanisms responsible for the development of HMOD and the role of pulse pressure in the prediction of CV outcome.
Identifiers
42649236What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.