ArticleNature communications2026
Food-related energy consumption can help reveal poverty in rural Chinese households.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Energy consumption for cooking is important for satisfying basic needs, complementing traditional poverty measurements. Here, we propose an energy consumption-based indicator (Energy Engel Coefficient) that measures the proportion of household energy dedicated to food preparation activities relative to the total. Using a nation-wide household survey in China, we find that this indicator exhibits consistent patterns with regional and household characteristics. In addition, it more accurately reflects Engel's Law than traditional Engel Coefficient, which holds that households with lower incomes spend a larger proportion of their income on basic needs. Our proposed measure also shows stronger performance than traditional coefficient in comparing with non-monetary metrics like subjective experience and asset ownership. Our analysis reveals that the Energy Engel Coefficient identifies 13.9% of households experiencing poverty, with 85.8% of these households not identified by the traditional coefficient. These households are predominantly low-income, small-sized rural ones. Therefore, this indicator complements poverty identification and contributes to improving the distribution of welfare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.