ArticleTranslational psychiatry2026
Exploring serum biomarkers in paediatric psychiatry: the impact of NfL and GFAP.
Article in Translational psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) are biomarkers of neuroaxonal and astrocytic damage but remain understudied in adolescent psychiatric populations. This study investigated sNfL and GFAP levels in 412 adolescents diagnosed with anorexia nervosa (AN) (n = 52), depression (n = 237), and other psychiatric disorders (n = 123). We assessed their diagnostic utility, correlation with disease severity, and longitudinal changes during AN treatment. Biomarkers were measured using Single Molecule Array technology, with Z-scores derived from reference datasets. Compared to population norms, both biomarkers were elevated in AN (sNfL: 1.15 ± 1.17; GFAP: 1.50 ± 0.84) and in depression (sNfL: 0.34 ± 1.10; GFAP: 0.58 ± 1.00). Patients with AN showed significantly higher biomarker levels than those with depression or other psychiatric disorders; importantly, this distinction remained evident in sensitivity analyses restricted to underweight individuals with depression. In AN, sNfL levels correlated with baseline weight loss (β = -0.45, R² = 0.20) and declined significantly during treatment, while GFAP changes were less pronounced. Neither marker correlated with depressive symptom severity. Bootstrapped ROC analyses showed moderate-to-good discriminatory power (AUCs 0.70-0.84) for distinguishing AN from depression. These findings suggest that neuroaxonal and astrocytic stress is a component of adolescent psychopathology, particularly in AN. sNfL appears sensitive to starvation-related neurobiological changes, with levels normalizing alongside weight restoration. GFAP showed similar but less robust trends. Accordingly, the observed biomarker changes reflect more than underweight alone, supporting a potential role in differential diagnosis and treatment monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.