ArticleNature communications2026
Phase-independent wireless data aggregation via optical in-sensor computing.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The data-intensive nature of the Internet of Things (IoT) significantly challenges conventional communication systems. While over-the-air computation integrates communication and computation to reduce data aggregation burdens, it requires strict synchronization of transmitted signals, increasing system overhead. Here, we report an optical in-sensor wireless data aggregation paradigm that exploits photocarrier trapping in defect-dominated persistent photoconductance sensors to reduce dependence on synchronization constraints. Within a single communication window, the system reliably aggregates incoherent optical signals with relative timing offsets exceeding the signal duration by up to 120%, while achieving computation errors below 1.5% normalized mean squared error. This process achieves unbiased integration with pulsed low-frequency readout, indicating its potential for ultra-low power operation. A distributed temperature prediction model based on this paradigm shows faster convergence and competitive accuracy with a simplified architecture, demonstrating effectiveness in distributed edge sensing scenarios. This work provides a promising hardware implementation for low-power data aggregation in large-scale IoT edge networks.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.