Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42649111›Full record

ArticleDiabetes, obesity & metabolism2026

Improving Short- and Long-Term Type 2 Diabetes Risk Prediction for Middle-Aged British Adults.

Cunrong Huang, Andre Lopes, Annie Britton

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Cunrong HuangDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3445-5316
Andre LopesCancer Research UK and Cancer Trials Centre, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1405-7337
Annie BrittonDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6412-5430

Funding

Medical Research Council R024227Medical Research Council S011676Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 221854/Z/20/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsDiabetes prediction tools are valuable for prevention and resource planning. Few tools exist to predict long-term diabetes risk for British adults. We aim to develop and validate a diabetes prediction tool for short- and long-term risk. MATERIALS AND

methodsPrediction model development (Training, n = 4502) and internal validation (Test, n = 1929) used Whitehall II data (WHII); external validation used English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA) data, with incident diabetes as outcome. Predictors were selected using LASSO-Cox, random survival forests (RSF) and best subset selection. Three candidate Cox models were built from these predictor sets and compared. Performance was assessed with C-indices, calibration and decision curve analysis (DCA). A continuous risk score and quartile-based risk groups were derived; a nomogram was created.

resultsAcross WHII Test (235 events) and ELSA (255 events), three models showed broadly similar discrimination, calibration and DCA patterns. LASSO- and RSF-selected models performed comparably and slightly better than best subset. LASSO and RSF both selected ethnicity, body mass index, waist-to-height ratio, height, triglyceride-glucose index, fasting glucose, family history of diabetes and socioeconomic status; LASSO additionally selected smoking, whereas RSF also included age, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, systolic and diastolic blood pressure. In ELSA, risk-score C-indices (95% CIs) were 0.800 (0.773-0.827) for the LASSO-selected model and 0.801 (0.774-0.827) for the RSF-selected model; risk-group C-indices were 0.737 (0.715-0.759) and 0.727 (0.707-0.748), respectively.

conclusionsWe developed and externally validated a tool to estimate 5-, 10- and 15-year diabetes risk in British middle-aged adults, which may support primary care decision-making.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedNomogramsPrediction AlgorithmsProportional Hazards ModelsRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsUnited Kingdomgeneral practicelong‐term riskprediction toolshort‐term risktype 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID42649111
PMCPMC13646339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.