Trial reportEnvironmental health and preventive medicine2026
Short-term effects of urban versus forest bathing on stress, mood, sleep, immune function, and metabolic health: a randomized, open-label, 2 × 2 crossover trial.
Trial report in Environmental health and preventive medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEvidence regarding the effects of forest bathing on young adults, particularly in low-latitude regions, remains limited. A more comprehensive understanding of its psychological and physiological impacts is needed to inform its potential role in public health.
objectivesTo compare the short-term effects of forest versus urban exposure on stress, mood, sleep quality, immune-related parameters, and metabolic markers in healthy young adults.
methodsIn this randomized, open-label, 2 × 2 crossover trial, 36 participants were assigned to forest-urban or urban-forest sequences with a 1-week washout period. Participants walked 2.5 km twice daily in each environment. Psychological scales and fasting blood samples were collected before and after each intervention. Linear mixed-effects models accounting for period and sequence effects were applied.
resultsForest bathing significantly reduced perceived stress (PSS: 22.3 to 20.7) and mood disturbance (POMS: 104.6 to 93.2), and improved sleep quality (SRSS: 20.5 to 18.0) and insomnia severity (AIS: 6.2 to 4.8), whereas no comparable improvements were observed following urban exposure. Hematological analyses revealed modest reductions in total white blood cell count and selected leukocyte subsets after forest bathing, with values remaining within physiological ranges. Forest exposure was also associated with small decreases in fasting blood glucose and log-transformed triglycerides. In contrast, DHEA-S levels increased following urban exposure but remained stable during forest exposure.
conclusionsIn healthy young adults, short-term forest bathing was associated with robust improvements in psychological well-being and sleep quality, accompanied by modest physiological modulation compared with urban exposure. These findings support the potential role of forest environments as a complementary strategy for stress reduction, while the clinical significance of short-term biological changes warrants further investigation. CLINICAL
trial registrationThis study was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (Registration number: ChiCTR2500096972).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.