ArticleBMJ open2026
Efficacy and safety of stellate ganglion block for postherpetic neuralgia: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) is the most common chronic complication of herpes zoster, characterised by persistent pain after the rash subsides with a particularly high incidence among the elderly population. Its pathological mechanism involves peripheral and central sensitisation, often leading to severe pain, sleep disturbances, emotional issues and a decline in quality of life, posing a significant burden on healthcare and society. Current clinical treatments primarily rely on pharmacological and interventional therapies yet their efficacy remains suboptimal. Stellate ganglion block (SGB), as an interventional technique targeting the sympathetic nervous system, is believed to alleviate PHN by modulating neurovascular function, inhibiting inflammatory responses and blocking pain transmission pathways. However, evidence-based data on its efficacy and safety remain insufficient and existing study results are inconsistent. Therefore, this study aims to comprehensively evaluate the effectiveness and safety of SGB in treating PHN through a systematic review and meta-analysis.
methodsThis systematic review and meta-analysis will be conducted in strict accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A systematic search will be performed for relevant randomised controlled trials published from the inception of each database until 31 December 2025, in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database and VIP Database. Two researchers will independently complete the literature screening, data extraction and cross-verification. The methodological quality of the included studies will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Statistical analysis will be performed using RevMan V.5.4 software: continuous variables will be analysed by calculating the mean difference and 95% CI, and dichotomous variables will be analysed by calculating the OR and 95% CI. Based on the results of heterogeneity testing (I² statistic), either a fixed-effects model or a random-effects model will be employed for data synthesis. Subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses will be conducted to explore sources of heterogeneity, and a grading system will be used to assess the quality of the evidence. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required for this study, as it does not involve the collection of primary data from individual patients. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD420251128909.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.