Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42647580›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2026

Simulation and inference methods for non-Markovian stochastic reaction networks.

Thomas P Steele, David J Warne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Thomas P SteeleSchool of Mathematical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
David J WarneSchool of Mathematical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9225-175X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stochastic models of reaction networks are widely used to capture intrinsic noise in complex systems in the life sciences. Typical formulations of these models are based on Markov processes for which there is extensive research on efficient simulation and inference. However, there are complex processes in biology, such as gene transcription and translation, that introduce history dependent dynamics requiring non-Markovian processes to accurately capture the stochastic dynamics of the system. This greater realism comes with additional computational challenges for simulation and parameter inference. We develop efficient stochastic simulation algorithms for well-mixed non-Markovian stochastic reaction networks with stochastic delays that depend on system state and time. Our methods generalize the next reaction method and τ-leaping method to support arbitrary inter-event time distributions while preserving computational scalability. We also introduce a coupling scheme to generate exact non-Markovian sample paths that are positively correlated to an approximate non-Markovian τ-leaping sample path. This enables substantial computational gains for simulation and Bayesian inference through multilevel Monte Carlo and multifidelity schemes. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach using several non-Markovian examples, showing substantial gains in both simulation accuracy and inference efficiency. These results extend the practical applicability of non-Markovian models in systems biology and beyond.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyModels, BiologicalAlgorithmsBayes TheoremComputer SimulationMarkov ChainsMonte Carlo MethodStochastic Processes

Identifiers

PMID42647580
PMCPMC13596995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.