Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42647571›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Linguistic markers of deception in Arabic news headlines: A cross-corpus study of stylistic and numeric features.

Eman Salamah Albtoush, Keng Hoon Gan, Saif Addeen A Alrababah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eman Salamah AlbtoushSchool of Computer Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Gelugor, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4486-3110
Keng Hoon GanSchool of Computer Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Gelugor, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2972-3523
Saif Addeen A AlrababahFaculty of Information Technology, Al alBayt University, Mafraq, Jordan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid spread of misinformation in Arabic news headlines poses a growing challenge to digital media integrity, given the scarcity of Arabic-specific automated detection tools relative to English-centric systems. Headlines are brief and context-limited, yet their lexical and stylistic patterns encode strong cues of veracity or deception, making headline-only detection practically urgent and linguistically tractable. This study investigates automatic fake-news detection using Arabic headlines, leveraging five heterogeneous corpora and their unified combination. English sets were incorporated via neural machine translation with light post-normalization that preserves stylistic cues, yielding a heterogeneous cross-domain corpus. A systematic analysis of linguistic and stylistic indicators reveals stable asymmetries between fake and real headlines that recur across domains. We evaluate approaches from classical TF-IDF baselines to Arabic-specialized transformers, and propose a late-fusion strategy coupling transformer representations with discriminative engineered features. Transformers consistently outperform classical baselines, confirming that subword representations effectively capture semantic and stylistic regularities in short Arabic texts. Late fusion yields statistically significant improvements only on datasets with prominent numeric or temporal cues; on the unified corpus, McNemar's exact test confirms that fusion gains are non-significant, indicating that subword encoders already internalize the surface-level cues captured by the engineered features. Even where accuracy differences are marginal, interpretable features enhance explainability.

Indexed as

DeceptionLinguisticsDigital MediaHumansLanguage

Identifiers

PMID42647571
PMCPMC13515018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.