ArticlePloS one2026
Integrated transcriptomic profiling implicates MAPK14/p38α as a candidate shared molecular target at the sepsis-postoperative delirium interface with computational evidence for a losartan-MAPK14 association.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSepsis and postoperative delirium (POD) may share inflammatory and neuroimmune mechanisms, but their common molecular basis remains unclear. This study aimed to identify candidate shared molecular targets and explore a clinically feasible pharmacological candidate linked to the prioritized target.
methodsMulti-cohort transcriptomic data from the Gene Expression Omnibus were integrated. Marked test-statistic inflation in the sepsis discovery cohort GSE65682 was addressed using a Removal of Unwanted Variation 2 (RUV2)-style adjustment based on the 10% lowest-variance genes and four estimated unwanted factors. Transcriptome-wide directional concordance between sepsis and POD was assessed using a rank-rank hypergeometric overlap-like analysis. Separately, RUV2-corrected sepsis differentially expressed genes were intersected with nominally significant POD candidate genes, and directionally concordant genes underwent functional-enrichment and protein-protein interaction analyses. Candidate genes retained from the protein-protein interaction (PPI) network analysis were further evaluated through cross-cohort expression analysis and SHAP-based feature importance analysis. Following target prioritization, target-guided pharmacological assessment, molecular docking, and immune-cell signature analysis were performed.
resultsRUV2-style adjustment reduced the genomic inflation factor in GSE65682 from 41.49 to 6.09, although residual inflation remained. The corrected analysis identified 440 sepsis-associated differentially expressed genes. Forty-four genes overlapped with the exploratory POD candidate set, of which 22 showed concordant directions of change. PPI analysis identified seven network-connected candidates. MAPK14 showed consistent disease-associated upregulation across the sepsis discovery cohort, an independent sepsis cohort, and the POD cohort, and had the highest SHAP contribution. Following prioritization of MAPK14, pharmacological candidates linked to this target were evaluated, leading to the selection of losartan as a clinically feasible candidate for exploratory assessment. Molecular docking suggested structural plausibility but did not establish direct binding or functional inhibition. MAPK14 expression was also positively associated with a neutrophil-predominant immune signature.
conclusionsThese findings implicate MAPK14/p38α as a candidate shared molecular target between sepsis and POD. The losartan-MAPK14 association remains computational and hypothesis-generating and requires experimental and prospective clinical validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.