SynthesisPloS one2026
Global prevalence of impostor phenomenon in medical students: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionImpostor phenomenon (IP) is a psychological phenomenon in which successful individuals fail to internalize their achievements and fear being exposed as "incompetent." Medical students may be particularly vulnerable to IP because medical training combines repeated high-stakes assessment, competitive peer comparison, hierarchical clinical supervision, and rapid professional identity transition, potentially affecting psychological well-being and academic performance.
objectiveTo estimate the global prevalence of IP in pre-licensure medical students and analyze differences by sex, academic stage, and geographic region.
methodsA systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and EMBASE, including studies published between January 1, 2000, and June 30, 2025. Observational studies reporting IP prevalence in pre-licensure medical students using validated instruments were selected. Pooled prevalences were calculated using random-effects meta-analysis, with subgroup analyses and meta-regression by publication year.
resultsThirty-five studies were included for qualitative synthesis, with 26 studies (n = 9,110 students) employing the Clance Impostor Phenomenon Scale (CIPS) included in the primary meta-analysis. The global CIPS-based prevalence was 54.2% (95% CI: 47.0%-61.3%) with high heterogeneity (I² = 98%). Studies using probabilistic sampling (n = 4) reported 36.5% prevalence, while non-probabilistic sampling (n = 22) yielded 57.5%. Prevalence was similar between women (50.5%) and men (47.1%), and between preclinical (48.9%) and clinical (46.8%) students. The highest rates were observed in the United Arab Emirates (89.5%), Canada (75.8%), and the United Kingdom (66.0%), while Peru presented the lowest estimate among CIPS studies (30.6%). Meta-regression showed no significant temporal trend from 2018-2024 (β = 0.0221, p = 0.1747).
conclusionsIP was frequent among pre-licensure medical students, although pooled estimates should be interpreted cautiously because heterogeneity was substantial and prevalence varied by sampling method and geographic context. These findings support the need for standardized measurement, probabilistic sampling when feasible, longitudinal research, and rigorously evaluated interventions addressing both individual coping and institutional educational practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.