ArticlePloS one2026
Rising food prices and widening nutrition gaps in Mexico: The cost of nutrient-dense and ultra-processed foods before, during, and after COVID-19.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted global food systems, contributing to rising food prices and altering the affordability of healthy diets. This study examined the relationship between nutrient density of foods, food prices and inflation in Mexico before, during, and after the pandemic. Foods from the ENSANUT dietary survey were assigned to 4 categories using the NOVA classification system and were linked to nutrient composition data and national food price series from 2012 to 2025. The Nutrient Rich Food Index (NRF9.3) was a measure of nutrient density. Affordability was defined as nutrient density relative to price per 100 kcal. Trends in prices and inflation were analyzed using a panel data model with food-level fixed effects. Minimally processed foods had substantially higher nutrient density (NRF9.3: 202.2) than processed (15.7) and ultra-processed foods (UPFs; 5.4), but were also markedly more expensive per 100 kcal. Across the study period, higher nutrient density was consistently associated with higher prices per calorie. During the pandemic, inflation for minimally processed foods increased by 1.64 percentage points (p.p.; p = 0.064) relative to pre-pandemic levels, and by 6.04 p.p. in the post-pandemic period (p < 0.001). Processed foods and culinary ingredients experienced additional inflation of 1.99 p.p. and 1.21 p.p., respectively, during the pandemic, while no significant differences across processing categories were observed post-pandemic. Following the onset of the pandemic, food prices increased across all processing categories. Because minimally processed foods had higher baseline prices, similar inflation rates translated into a widening affordability gap between more and less nutritious foods. These findings suggest that foods aligned with dietary recommendations became relatively less affordable during a period of economic disruption, potentially incentivizing substitution toward lower-cost, energy-dense UPFs. Policies that improve the affordability and price stability of nutrient-dense foods may be critical to support healthy diets under conditions of economic volatility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.