Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42647382›Full record

ArticleDermatopathology (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Quantifying the Interplay Between PRAME Expression and Classical Morphology: A Multivariable Analysis of 954 Suspected Melanocytic Lesions.

Frank Friedrich Gellrich, Alaska Kistner, Jakob Nikolas Kather, Narmin Ghaffari Laleh, Claudia Günther, Cosima Hufnagel, Sarah Hobelsberger, Jörg Laske, Stefan Beissert, Daniela Aust and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dermatopathology (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Frank Friedrich GellrichDepartment of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, 01304 Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2164-4644
Alaska KistnerDepartment of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, 01304 Dresden, Germany.
Jakob Nikolas KatherElse Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Technical University Dresden, 01304 Dresden, Germany.
Narmin Ghaffari LalehElse Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Technical University Dresden, 01304 Dresden, Germany.
Claudia GüntherDepartment of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, 01304 Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4330-1861
Cosima HufnagelDepartment of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, 01304 Dresden, Germany.
Sarah HobelsbergerDepartment of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, 01304 Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5703-324X
Jörg LaskeDepartment of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, 01304 Dresden, Germany.
Stefan BeissertDepartment of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, 01304 Dresden, Germany.
Daniela AustInstitute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, 01304 Dresden, Germany.
Gustavo BarettonInstitute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, 01304 Dresden, Germany.
Nick ReidowInstitute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, 01304 Dresden, Germany.
Mildred SergonInstitute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, 01304 Dresden, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The integration of immunohistochemical biomarkers like PRAME (Preferentially Expressed Antigen in Melanoma) into the histomorphological assessment of melanocytic lesions is gaining prominence. While PRAME's diagnostic value is widely recognized, its independent weight compared directly to classical morphology remains underexplored in large, challenging cohorts. This retrospective study quantifies the diagnostic utility of PRAME alongside traditional histomorphology in a high-risk cohort of 954 primary melanocytic lesions (335 nevi, 215 melanomas in situ, 404 invasive melanomas) where PRAME was clinically requested to resolve diagnostic ambiguity. Using Firth's penalized likelihood regression, a baseline diagnostic model utilizing 13 histomorphological features was established and subsequently integrated with PRAME expression. The pure morphology baseline model demonstrated a high cross-validated area under the curve (AUC) of 0.969. As a standalone marker, PRAME achieved an AUC of 0.895, with a diffuse expression score of 4+ yielding peak specificity (94.3%) and moderate sensitivity (77.9%). Integrating PRAME into the morphological model significantly enhanced diagnostic accuracy (AUC: 0.980;

Indexed as

dermatopathologydifferential diagnosismelanomamorphological criteriaPRAME

Identifiers

PMID42647382
PMCPMC13510435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.