ArticleDermatopathology (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Quantifying the Interplay Between PRAME Expression and Classical Morphology: A Multivariable Analysis of 954 Suspected Melanocytic Lesions.
Article in Dermatopathology (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The integration of immunohistochemical biomarkers like PRAME (Preferentially Expressed Antigen in Melanoma) into the histomorphological assessment of melanocytic lesions is gaining prominence. While PRAME's diagnostic value is widely recognized, its independent weight compared directly to classical morphology remains underexplored in large, challenging cohorts. This retrospective study quantifies the diagnostic utility of PRAME alongside traditional histomorphology in a high-risk cohort of 954 primary melanocytic lesions (335 nevi, 215 melanomas in situ, 404 invasive melanomas) where PRAME was clinically requested to resolve diagnostic ambiguity. Using Firth's penalized likelihood regression, a baseline diagnostic model utilizing 13 histomorphological features was established and subsequently integrated with PRAME expression. The pure morphology baseline model demonstrated a high cross-validated area under the curve (AUC) of 0.969. As a standalone marker, PRAME achieved an AUC of 0.895, with a diffuse expression score of 4+ yielding peak specificity (94.3%) and moderate sensitivity (77.9%). Integrating PRAME into the morphological model significantly enhanced diagnostic accuracy (AUC: 0.980;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.