ReviewJournal of functional morphology and kinesiology2026
A Narrative Review of HRV Metric Selection for Applied Monitoring: RMSSD as the Default Metric for Sport and Exercise.
Review in Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heart rate variability (HRV) monitoring is commonly used in sport and exercise science to assess recovery, training adaptation, and performance readiness. However, the routine reporting of numerous HRV metrics with substantial conceptual and physiological overlap has created inconsistency regarding which indices should be prioritized for applied monitoring. This narrative review synthesizes the contemporary literature to provide practical recommendations regarding HRV metric selection in applied monitoring, with particular emphasis on whether the root mean square of successive differences between adjacent normal-to-normal intervals (RMSSD) may serve as the primary metric for routine HRV monitoring in many healthy sport and exercise populations. RMSSD demonstrates several characteristics favorable for applied monitoring, including strong physiological relevance, favorable reliability, compatibility with ultra-short recording durations, relative robustness during spontaneous breathing, computational simplicity, and suitability for longitudinal monitoring frameworks. Although additional HRV metrics remain valuable for addressing specific physiological, mechanistic, or research questions, the current evidence supports RMSSD as the primary metric for routine HRV monitoring in many sport and exercise settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.