Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42647255›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of neonatal screening2026

Optimizing Kappa-Deleting Recombination Excision Circles (KREC) Cut-Off Values in Russian Newborn Screening Program: Balancing Sensitivity and False-Positive Rates.

Andrey Marakhonov, Anna Mukhina, Irina Efimova, Natalya Balinova, Yulia Rodina, Rena Zinchenko, Sergey Voronin, Anna Shcherbina, Sergey Kutsev

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of neonatal screening, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Andrey MarakhonovResearch Centre for Medical Genetics, Moscow 115522, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-0972-5118
Anna MukhinaResearch Centre for Medical Genetics, Moscow 115522, Russia.
Irina EfimovaResearch Centre for Medical Genetics, Moscow 115522, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-4672-1447
Natalya BalinovaResearch Centre for Medical Genetics, Moscow 115522, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-9493-6544
Yulia RodinaDmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Moscow 117198, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-9857-4456
Rena ZinchenkoResearch Centre for Medical Genetics, Moscow 115522, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-3586-3458
Sergey VoroninResearch Centre for Medical Genetics, Moscow 115522, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-9918-9565
Anna ShcherbinaDmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Moscow 117198, Russia.
Sergey KutsevResearch Centre for Medical Genetics, Moscow 115522, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Newborn screening (NBS) for primary immunodeficiencies (PIDs) increasingly incorporates kappa-deleting recombination excision circles (KREC) to enable early detection of B-cell lymphopenia, particularly agammaglobulinemia (AGG). However, optimal KREC cut-off values remain poorly defined, limiting sensitivity and contributing to high false-positive rates. We evaluated KREC-based NBS using data from a nationwide Russian program that screened more than 3.4 million newborns. KREC measurements from 66 patients with genetically confirmed AGG and 534 newborns with initially abnormal screening results but normal immunophenotyping were analyzed using statistical and ROC-based approaches. By using a KREC cut-off of 100 copies per 10

Indexed as

cut-offimproved algorithmkappa-deleting recombination excision circles (KREC)newborn screeningtransient B-cell lymphopeniaX-linked agammaglobulinemia

Identifiers

PMID42647255
PMCPMC13510754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.