ArticleInternational journal of neonatal screening2026
Features and Legal Practice of Dried Blood Spot Card Biobanking in Europe: Balancing Research Potential with Parental and Children's Rights.
Article in International journal of neonatal screening, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
36 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neonatal screening using Dried Blood Spot (DBS) cards is an important and successful public health facility in Europe, enabling early detection of congenital disorders for early treatment and prevention of overt disease. Biobanks of stored DBS cards offer significant potential for biomedical research. Biobanking and secondary use of DBS cards also raise ethical and legal issues, particularly concerning the rights of parents and children. This study provides a comprehensive overview of legislation and legal practices governing DBS biobanking across 29 European countries, based on a survey conducted in collaboration with the International Society for Neonatal Screening. Findings reveal a highly heterogeneous landscape: 15 countries have national legislation, five have regional guidelines, and nine lack formal regulations. Only four countries require explicit parental consent for DBS storage, with considerable variation in approval processes for research use. A harmonization of practices, with the European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) as a basis for future regulation, supplemented by clearer guidance on 'public interest' and robust safeguards for individual rights may lead to more transparent and consistent governance, which is essential to balance scientific progress with the protection of parental and children's rights in DBS-based research across Europe.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.