ArticleInternational journal of neonatal screening2026
Attitudes Toward Sex-Specific Versus Universal Newborn Screening for X-Linked Adrenoleukodystrophy in Hong Kong.
Article in International journal of neonatal screening, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy (X-ALD) is the most common peroxisomal disorder and is associated with serious clinical consequences. While newborn screening (NBS) could facilitate early identification and timely intervention, its implementation for X-ALD remains controversial due to ethical concerns arising from its X-linked recessive inheritance pattern, particularly regarding female newborns. This study aims to explore the perspectives of healthcare professionals and the general public on NBS for X-ALD in Hong Kong. An online survey with 20 quantitative questions on ethical considerations was conducted from May to August 2024. Among a total of 259 responses, most respondents (99.2%) supported NBS for their male newborns, primarily because it facilitates early diagnosis and effective management. The majority of the respondents were in favor of offering NBS to female newborns, citing potential benefits for the management of adult-onset disease, enhanced family planning and support, and opportunities for extended family screening. However, some respondents expressed concerns regarding (1) psychological stress and anxiety from uncertain disease onset and frequent monitoring; (2) potential genetic discrimination and adverse impact on insurance premiums/coverage; (3) affordability and accessibility of expensive treatments, such as gene therapy; and (4) ethical issues regarding children's "right to an open future", particularly for late-onset female X-ALD. To address these concerns while respecting family autonomy, we propose an opt-in system with clear, balanced information for parents, combined with a three-tier screening algorithm. In summary, while inclusion of X-ALD in Hong Kong's NBS program receives strong community support, targeted measures are needed to mitigate the identified ethical and practical barriers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.