ArticleInternational journal of neonatal screening2026
Communicating a Congenital Cytomegalovirus Diagnosis: Parent Experiences and a Clinical Framework.
Article in International journal of neonatal screening, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) is characterized by highly variable outcomes; how diagnostic information is communicated to families is critical, yet parent experiences of communication following a cCMV diagnosis are not well described. The objective was to examine parent experiences of communication following a cCMV diagnosis and identify opportunities to improve communication in the setting of clinical uncertainty. The method used was semi-structured interviews with 41 mothers of children with cCMV explored communication of diagnostic results, interactions with healthcare providers, and perceptions of information clarity, timing, and adequacy. Transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis. Participants described variability in diagnostic communication, including differences in timing, modality, and content. Some received in-person counseling, whereas others learned of the diagnosis through phone calls, written communication, or electronic health portals prior to provider contact. Many reported limited explanation, insufficient anticipatory guidance, and inconsistent or incomplete information across providers. These communication gaps contributed to confusion, increased reliance on external information sources, and diminished trust in the healthcare system. Participants emphasized the importance of clear, compassionate communication that acknowledges uncertainty while providing actionable guidance. Communication surrounding cCMV diagnosis is inconsistent and often does not meet family needs. Diagnostic disclosure should function as a clinical intervention requiring clear, patient-centered, longitudinal communication to support families navigating uncertainty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.