Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42647216›Full record

ArticleJournal of market access & health policy2026

From Joint Clinical Assessment to National Decisions: EU HTA Implementation and Implications for Patient Access.

Kalpana D'Oca, Ada Adriano, Eline Darquennes, Natalie Steck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of market access & health policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kalpana D'OcaMSD (UK) Limited, London EC2M 6UR, UK.
Ada AdrianoMSD (UK) Limited, London EC2M 6UR, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8894-9007
Eline DarquennesMSD Belgium, 1170 Brussels, Belgium.
Natalie SteckMSD Innovation & Development GmbH, CH-8058 Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The introduction of Joint Clinical Assessments (JCAs) under the European Union Health Technology Assessment Regulation (EU HTAR) represents a major structural reform aimed at reducing fragmentation and duplication in clinical evidence assessment across Member States. While JCAs are intended to support national health technology assessment (HTA) processes through a common EU-level clinical evaluation, their integration into established national HTA and reimbursement systems remains untested at this early stage of implementation. This paper reports findings from two surveys conducted in 2025 among local affiliate representatives with expertise in relevant HTA and market access activities across 25 European countries (comprising 24 EU Member States and Norway), capturing early national perspectives on key aspects of JCA implementation. The surveys explored anticipated impact on national reimbursement timelines, current opportunities for early HTA advice and PICO input, approaches to handling post-JCA data availability, and nationally prioritised policy and implementation issues. Results indicate mixed expectations regarding the potential impact of JCA on reimbursement timelines, with perceived risks of delay largely viewed as possibly transitional and mitigable through national process adaptation. Respondents emphasised the importance of transparency in PICO consolidation and clarity on the use of JCA reports in national appraisals. Overall, the findings suggest that JCA may represent a reconfiguration rather than a centralisation of evidence assessment, with national influence exercised earlier in the assessment lifecycle. These insights provide policy-relevant input to inform ongoing EU HTA implementation and future refinement of the JCA framework.

Indexed as

EU HTAJCAnational reimbursement timelinesPICO scoping

Identifiers

PMID42647216
PMCPMC13510652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.