ArticleJournal of market access & health policy2026
From Joint Clinical Assessment to National Decisions: EU HTA Implementation and Implications for Patient Access.
Article in Journal of market access & health policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The introduction of Joint Clinical Assessments (JCAs) under the European Union Health Technology Assessment Regulation (EU HTAR) represents a major structural reform aimed at reducing fragmentation and duplication in clinical evidence assessment across Member States. While JCAs are intended to support national health technology assessment (HTA) processes through a common EU-level clinical evaluation, their integration into established national HTA and reimbursement systems remains untested at this early stage of implementation. This paper reports findings from two surveys conducted in 2025 among local affiliate representatives with expertise in relevant HTA and market access activities across 25 European countries (comprising 24 EU Member States and Norway), capturing early national perspectives on key aspects of JCA implementation. The surveys explored anticipated impact on national reimbursement timelines, current opportunities for early HTA advice and PICO input, approaches to handling post-JCA data availability, and nationally prioritised policy and implementation issues. Results indicate mixed expectations regarding the potential impact of JCA on reimbursement timelines, with perceived risks of delay largely viewed as possibly transitional and mitigable through national process adaptation. Respondents emphasised the importance of transparency in PICO consolidation and clarity on the use of JCA reports in national appraisals. Overall, the findings suggest that JCA may represent a reconfiguration rather than a centralisation of evidence assessment, with national influence exercised earlier in the assessment lifecycle. These insights provide policy-relevant input to inform ongoing EU HTA implementation and future refinement of the JCA framework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.