ArticleJournal of market access & health policy2026
Treatment Preferences in Acute Allergic Reactions-How Can the Context Impact the Preference for a Corticosteroid Mouth Film Versus Conventional Tablets?
Article in Journal of market access & health policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe objective was to assess how preferences for a self-dissolving dexamethasone mouth film versus conventional tablets for acute allergic reactions may vary according to population characteristics and the level of outcome knowledge for the intervention (i.e., ex ante, interim, and ex post).
methodsWe used preference data from two studies: a questionnaire study with a choice between mouth film and tablets based on a description of the mouth film (ex ante), and a clinical trial with ratings of accessibility and perceived security when the mouth film was available (interim) or used for acute allergic reactions (ex post). Associations between preferences and participant characteristics (demographics and clinical history) were analyzed using logistic regression models.
resultsPreference for the mouth film over tablets remained strong as outcome information increased from ex ante to ex post and was consistent across study populations. Higher relative preference was associated with female sex, longer disease duration, older age, and prior severe reactions, whereas satisfaction with current treatment and regular allergy check-ups were linked to weaker relative preference.
conclusionsPreference for the mouth film over tablets was stable, but the degree of preference may depend on characteristics that influence sensitivity to treatment challenges in acute situations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.