ReviewEpigenomes2026
DNA Methylation in Neurobiological Genes Associated with Problematic Digital Use in Adolescents and Young Adults: Systematic Review and Exploratory Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Emerging Evidence.
Review in Epigenomes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundProblematic digital use in adolescents and young adults has emerged as a relevant exposure for mental health and neurobiological vulnerability. However, its relationship with peripheral DNA methylation differences in neurobiologically relevant genes remains poorly synthesized.
objectiveThis systematic review and exploratory multilevel meta-analysis aimed to synthesize available scientific evidence on associations between phenotypes of problematic internet or smartphone use and DNA methylation differences in neurobiologically relevant genes, and to quantitatively explore the average magnitude of these associations from available data.
methodsPrimary human studies were identified through a search strategy with no initial publication-year restriction; the eligible studies retrieved and included in the review were published between 2018 and 2024. The review followed PRISMA criteria and a broad, predefined eligibility strategy to capture both direct and indirect evidence. Seven studies were included in the systematic review; four provided quantifiable data for statistical synthesis, from which 41 effect sizes were harmonized. Analyses were performed in R using multilevel meta-analysis and meta-regression models with REML estimation, supplemented by sensitivity analyses with robust variance estimation.
resultsThe main meta-analysis revealed a significant positive association between problematic digital exposure and DNA methylation differences (Fisher's z = 0.2957; r = 0.287; 95% CI [0.1146, 0.4769]; SIGNIFICANCE: These findings should be interpreted as exploratory evidence of a biologically plausible association between problematic digital exposure and peripheral DNA methylation differences in neurobiologically relevant genes, rather than as causal or clinically validated biomarker evidence. The available evidence remains methodologically heterogeneous, preliminary, and dependent on a small number of independent studies, underscoring the need for larger, longitudinal, and more methodologically rigorous research in this field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.