ArticleThe European journal of general practice2026
Beyond clinical care: A qualitative study on the leadership role of general practitioners in dutch interprofessional care for older adults.
Article in The European journal of general practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFrail older adults increasingly require coordinated, interprofessional primary care, yet leadership within these loosely organised teams is often informal and poorly understood. While general practitioners (GPs) are often seen as having a central role in leadership, little is known about how they themselves perceive and enact this role.
objectivesTo explore how Dutch GPs understand and operationalise informal leadership within interprofessional primary care teams caring for frail older adults.
methodsA qualitative interview study was conducted with ten Dutch GPs using semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed inductively through thematic analysis.
resultsGPs expressed ambivalence about being labelled as 'leaders', associating the term with hierarchy. Nonetheless, they enacted leadership through responsibilities embedded in everyday practice, including ensuring continuity of care, coordinating professionals, and maintaining oversight. Leadership was largely pragmatic and reactive: GPs often initiated collaboration and provided oversight but rarely engaged in shared goal setting or facilitating team learning. Satisfaction with current collaboration and competing priorities resulted in limited motivation to optimise interprofessional practice.
conclusionGPs enact informal leadership primarily through responsibility and accountability for continuity and oversight rather than through strategic or explicitly shared leadership practices. Because collaboration is generally perceived as adequate, motivation to further develop team processes appears limited. More strategic elements, such as shared goal setting and proactive team learning, are less developed. Strengthening awareness of leadership roles within interprofessional teams may support more balanced responsibility-sharing and enhance care for frail older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.