ArticleToxics2026
Influence of Chelator Type on the Efficiency and Mechanisms of Electrokinetic Remediation of Copper- and Lead-Contaminated Loess.
Article in Toxics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the continued advancement of industrialization and urbanization in northwestern China, heavy metal contamination of loess sites has become an increasingly serious environmental issue. Heavy metals such as copper (Cu) and lead (Pb) are toxic, persistent, and readily retained by the mineral-pore framework of loess, which makes remediation difficult and threatens regional ecological security and human health. This study investigated electrokinetic (EK) remediation of artificially prepared loess co-contaminated with Cu and Pb using tartaric acid (TA), citric acid (CA), and disodium ethylenediaminetetraacetate (EDTA) as catholytes. Cu was generally removed more effectively than Pb because Pb was less adsorbed and immobilized more strongly. All three chelators enhanced metal desorption and migration through complexation, particularly in the cathode-side section. EDTA produced the greatest enhancement because it formed stable, negatively charged complexes with Cu and Pb over a broad pH range. Relative to the deionized-water control, EDTA increased the overall removal efficiencies of Cu and Pb to 55.4% and 27.2%, respectively, and promoted their transfer from the soil to the anolyte. These findings demonstrate that chelator-assisted EK treatment, particularly with EDTA, can effectively improve Cu and Pb removal from loess, while field application requires control of energy use, residual chelator, and post-treatment metal mobility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.