Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42646907›Full record

ArticleJAMA psychiatry2026

Potential for Genomics to Help Guide Preventive Strategies in Psychiatry.

Katherine L Musliner, Eva C Schulte, Gerome Breen, Giuseppe Fanelli, Andreas J Forstner, Philip R Jansen, Kimberley M Kendall, Jurjen Luykx, Vincent Millischer, Sergi Papiol and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Katherine L MuslinerDepartment of Affective Disorders, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Eva C SchulteUniversity of Bonn, University Hospital Bonn, Department of Psychiatry & Psychotherapy, Bonn, Germany.
Gerome BreenSocial, Genetic & Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Giuseppe FanelliDepartment of Medicine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
Andreas J ForstnerUniversity of Bonn, University Hospital Bonn, Institute of Human Genetics, Bonn, Germany.
Philip R JansenAmsterdam UMC, Department of Human Genetics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Kimberley M KendallCentre for Neuropsychiatric Genetics and Genomics, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Jurjen LuykxDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Vincent MillischerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Clinical Division of General Psychiatry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Sergi PapiolInstitute of Psychiatric Phenomics and Genomics, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Evangelos VassosSocial, Genetic & Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Boris ChaumetteUniversité Paris Cité, NeuroDiderot, Institut Pasteur, GHU Paris Psychiatrie et Neurociences, Paris, France.
Wouter J PeyrotDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Psychiatric disorders are a major source of disability and premature mortality worldwide. Advances in genomics have clarified parts of their genetic architecture, prompting questions about whether genomic information can inform preventive strategies for psychiatric disorders in clinical practice. This Special Communication describes potential benefits and harms of using genomic information, particularly polygenic scores (PGSs) and rare variants, to guide prevention in psychiatry. Observations: Broad application of genomic testing in universal or selective primary prevention is not currently supported by evidence of net clinical benefit, given modest absolute risk differences, limited individual-level predictive performance, and the potential for psychological harm. The possible value of genomic testing increases for indicated primary prevention, as prior probability rises and diagnostic uncertainty becomes clinically relevant. The most compelling opportunity lies in early care after individuals enter the psychiatric treatment system but before diagnostic trajectories fully crystallize. In this zone of diagnostic uncertainty, testing for rare, high-impact variants can shorten diagnostic delays, inform prognosis, and guide monitoring and treatment, provided that results are communicated appropriately. PGSs may contribute to risk stratification when applied in high-risk clinical populations and integrated with nongenetic factors. In secondary and tertiary prevention, pharmacogenomics provides actionable benefits for medication choice and safety, and rare variant testing has clear value in selected instances. Beyond psychiatric outcomes, genomic testing could potentially help address the profound mortality gap in severe mental illness by identifying elevated risk for somatic comorbidities, thus supporting more proactive, integrated care. Conclusions and Relevance: Currently, genomic testing in psychiatry should not be used for population-wide screening but may have value as a targeted clinical resource whose utility depends on timing, context, and purpose. When applied judiciously and embedded within comprehensive, ethically grounded care pathways, genomic testing holds promise as one component of a more precise, preventive, and patient-centered psychiatry.

Identifiers

PMID42646907
PMCPMC7619499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.