ReviewSports (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Anatomical Variants of the Cervical Spine and Sports-Related Injury in Athletes: A Narrative Review.
Review in Sports (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Congenital and developmental cervical spine variants, as well as acquired or sport-adapted cervical morphologies, may alter canal reserve, segmental stability, foraminal dimensions, and the cervicothoracic outlet in athletes. This narrative review aimed to integrate the anatomically and methodologically heterogeneous literature linking these findings with sports-related injury and return-to-play decisions. PubMed/MEDLINE was searched from database inception through 6 July 2026 using controlled vocabulary and free-text terms for cervical anatomy, specific variants, athletic exposure, neurological syndromes, injury mechanisms, and return to sport; reference lists of relevant publications were also examined. English-language human studies were selected for direct anatomical, biomechanical, clinical, or athlete relevance and synthesized by evidence type, mechanism, vertebral level, and sport. The strongest athlete-specific evidence concerned developmental or functional cervical stenosis, space available for the cord, cervical cord neurapraxia, transient quadriparesis, and stingers in collision sports. Evidence for atlas arch defects, os odontoideum, Klippel-Feil syndrome, cervical spondylolysis, and cervical rib-related thoracic outlet syndrome was predominantly case-based or derived from expert guidance. These findings support cautious, individualized interpretation rather than universal clearance rules. Clinical assessment should integrate symptoms, neurological findings, imaging, dynamic stability, recurrence, and sport-specific exposure while recognizing that prospective athlete-specific evidence remains limited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.