Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42646841›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2026

Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure and Continuous Albuterol for Pediatric Asthma Exacerbations: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Patrick T Wilson, Melisa Tanverdi, John T Brinton, Lilliam Ambroggio, Stanley J Szefler

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05848115 (Understanding the Role of Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05848115 naterminatednot on this map

Understanding the Role of Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP) in Pediatric Acute Asthma Exacerbations: A Prospective, Randomized, Double Blind, Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Colorado, DenverRan2023 to 2025Enrolled67ConditionsAsthma in ChildrenArmsBi-level Positive Airway Pressure, Sham Bi-level Positive Airway Pressure
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Patrick T WilsonDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Anschutz School of Medicine, Aurora.
Melisa TanverdiDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Anschutz School of Medicine, Aurora.
John T BrintonDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Anschutz School of Medicine, Aurora.
Lilliam AmbroggioDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Anschutz School of Medicine, Aurora.
Stanley J SzeflerDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Anschutz School of Medicine, Aurora.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: A substantial knowledge gap remains in understanding the specific role bilevel positive airway pressure (BPAP) in the emergency department (ED) for acute pediatric asthma exacerbations. Objective: To examine whether the early application of BPAP in the ED for acute pediatric asthma exacerbations reduces duration of critical care management time. Design, Setting, and Participants: This double-blind randomized clinical trial enrolled children between 5 and 17 years of age presenting to a single-center, quaternary, referral pediatric ED with an acute asthma exacerbation, a pediatric respiratory assessment measure of at least 4 (moderate severity), and prescribed continuous albuterol therapy between June 1, 2023, and May 31, 2025. Intervention: Participants were randomized to either the intervention arm (BPAP) or control arm (sham BPAP, which delivers minimal pressure) for 4 hours. Neither the health care practitioners nor participants were aware of study arm allocation. Main Outcome and Measures: The primary outcome measure was duration of continuous albuterol therapy. A sequential design with a planned interim analysis for futility and superiority was used, and a t test compared mean duration of continuous β-agonist therapy under an intention-to-treat approach. Results: Sixty-six study participants (median [IQR] age, 10.2 [6.8-13.2] years; 35 [53.0%] male; 1 [1.5%] American Indian or Alaskan, 1 [1.5%] Asian, 21 [31.8%] Black or African American, 21 [31.8%] White, and 22 [33.3%] other race) were included in the primary analysis, with a mean (SD) pediatric respiratory assessment measure of 5.2 (1.9), indicating moderate disease. At the 50% interim analysis, participants in the BPAP study arm received a mean (SD) of 8.3 (8.5) hours of continuous albuterol vs 8.7 (10.0) hours in the control group (mean difference, -0.5 hours; 95% CI, -5.0 to 4.1 hours; P = .84). The study was stopped due to meeting a priori bounds for futility at the 50% interim analysis. No deaths, invasive mechanical ventilation, air leak syndrome, or aspiration pneumonia were observed in either study arm. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial of early initiation of BPAP in the ED, no clinically significant decrease in the duration of continuous β-agonist therapy in pediatric patients presenting with moderate asthma exacerbations was observed. Additional open-label studies in a more severe asthma cohort are required to better inform clinical practice. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05848115.

Indexed as

AlbuterolAsthmaBronchodilator AgentsPositive-Pressure RespirationAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolDouble-Blind MethodEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMaleAlbuterolBronchodilator Agents

Identifiers

PMID42646841
PMCPMC13519852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.