Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42646825›Full record

ArticleVision (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Machine Learning-Based Classification of Retinitis Pigmentosa from Color Fundus Images: A Reproducible Benchmark and Screening-Oriented Pipeline.

Francesco Cappellani, Giovanni Rubegni, Andrea Caruso, Alessia Cosentino, Roberta Torrisi, Grazia Pia Raciti, Marco Mastroeni, Gabriella Lupo, Caterina Gagliano, Massimiliano Salfi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vision (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Francesco CappellaniDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Catania, 95131 Catania, Italy.ORCID 0009-0007-6807-9455
Giovanni RubegniOphthalmology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8247-3666
Andrea CarusovEyes NPO, 95010 Milo, Italy.ORCID 0009-0004-6486-2184
Alessia CosentinoDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, 95131 Catania, Italy.ORCID 0009-0008-1709-5874
Roberta TorrisivEyes NPO, 95010 Milo, Italy.ORCID 0009-0000-1616-3267
Grazia Pia RacitivEyes NPO, 95010 Milo, Italy.ORCID 0009-0003-5277-0592
Marco MastroenivEyes NPO, 95010 Milo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5331-1203
Gabriella LupoDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, 95131 Catania, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9291-6969
Caterina GaglianoDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Enna "Kore", 94100 Enna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8424-0068
Massimiliano SalfivEyes NPO, 95010 Milo, Italy.ORCID 0009-0006-7420-6257

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retinitis pigmentosa (RP) is a rare inherited retinal disorder in which fundus changes may be subtle and heterogeneous, limiting detection from color fundus images. This study evaluated multiple machine learning architectures for binary-RP versus healthy-control classification, and developed a reproducible pipeline for research-oriented screening support. Three publicly available fundus datasets were combined, including 248 RP images and 1045 healthy controls. An 80/20 train-test split was used, with targeted data augmentation applied only to RP images in the training set to address class imbalance. ConvNeXt-Tiny, ResNet101V2, EfficientNet-B0, a baseline classifier, and custom shallow convolutional neural networks were compared using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, confusion matrices, and ROC/precision-recall analyses. A compact ShallowCNN provided the best sensitivity-performance trade-off. On the fixed image-level test set, Adam with a learning rate of 0.0005 reached 96.51% accuracy, while SGD with a learning rate of 0.001 achieved 98% RP recall, minimizing false negatives. The trained models were exported to ONNX and integrated into a Windows inference tool. The proposed framework provides an open, reproducible benchmark for technical evaluation, although external validation is required before clinical use.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceconvolutional neural networksfundus imagesmachine learningretinitis pigmentosascreening

Identifiers

PMID42646825
PMCPMC13517592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.