Observational studyMedical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
The Cervical Cancer Paradox in Eastern Europe: How Knowledge and Institutional Trust Shape HPV Vaccination Attitudes in Romania.
Observational study in Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlthough cervical cancer is a highly preventable malignancy, Romania continues to report critical mortality rates. This paradox is largely attributable to the suboptimal implementation of clinical guidelines and a passive, "opt-in" administrative framework. This cross-sectional study investigates the cognitive and behavioural determinants-specifically, human papillomavirus (HPV) knowledge, institutional trust in healthcare systems, and digital misinformation exposure-that modulate female attitudes toward HPV immunisation.
methodsAn observational cross-sectional study was conducted between December 2025 and March 2026 across four obstetrics and gynaecology clinics. Data were collected via digital questionnaires administered to adult female patients aged 18 to 65 years. The assessment tool evaluated four primary domains: HPV knowledge, perceived vaccine safety, immunisation intention, and the degree of exposure to social media misinformation.
resultsThe cohort demonstrated a substantially low vaccination rate (28.6%). Statistical analysis elucidated significant positive correlations between HPV knowledge, trust in health authorities, and vaccination intention. Furthermore, reliance on official information sources strongly correlated with perceived vaccine safety. Conversely, exposure to negative online content exhibited a weak negative association with knowledge levels, yet it did not directly influence vaccination intention.
conclusionsHealth literacy and institutional trust emerge as fundamental pillars for HPV vaccine acceptance. To overcome patient vaccine hesitancy, the national healthcare system must initiate a strategic paradigm shift, prioritising the neutralization of digital misinformation and transitioning from a passive model to a proactive, "opt-out" infrastructure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.